Skip to main content

Comparison • Checked October 2026

Supabase Alternatives

Supabase is a Postgres backend with auth, storage and an auto API. These are the 8 options people compare it with in 2026, what each one does, and where each one stops.

Why people look for a Supabase alternative

Most people leave Supabase for one of four reasons:

  • Data location. They need a specific region or their own server.
  • Price model. Usage limits or compute costs do not fit their app.
  • Less product. They want only the database, and bring their own auth and API.
  • Different model. They want NoSQL (Firebase), a single binary (PocketBase) or GraphQL (Nhost).

If none of these apply, stay on Supabase.

Quick comparison

Facts from each vendor page or repository, checked October 2026. Not stated means the vendor page checked did not say.

ToolTypeDatabaseLicenseSelf-hostFree tierEU region
FirebaseBaaSFirestore (NoSQL documents)Proprietary (Google service)No production self-hosting (Emulator Suite is for development only)Spark plan: 1 GiB stored, 50K reads, 20K writes and 20K deletes per day; Auth free to 50K MAUYes. eur3 (Belgium, Netherlands, witness in Finland), europe-west3 (Frankfurt) and others
AppwriteBaaSOwn database API (not Postgres)BSD-3-ClauseYes, with DockerFree plan: 2 projects, 1 database, 3 storage buckets, 5 functionsYes. Frankfurt (FRA). Amsterdam listed as coming soon
PocketBaseBaaS (single binary)SQLite (embedded)MITYes, only (you run the binary)Free software. You pay for the server you run it onYour choice of server, so any region you rent
NhostBaaSPostgres, with Hasura GraphQLMITYes, Docker Compose (example in the repo)Starter: $0 forever, 1 project, 1 GB database, 1 GB storage, 5 GB egressNot stated
ConvexBackend platform (framework)Convex’s own databaseFSL-1.1-Apache-2.0 (source-available, Apache-2.0 after two years)Yes, with DockerFree: $0, 0.5 GB database storage, 1 GB bandwidth, 1M function calls, 1 to 6 developersNot stated
NeonDB onlyPostgresApache-2.0Code is open source, but no supported self-hosted productFree: $0, 1 GB per project (20 GB total), 100 CU-hours per project, scales to zero after 5 minutesYes. aws-eu-central-1 (Frankfurt) and aws-eu-west-2 (London)
Self-hosted SupabaseBaaS (self-hosted)PostgresApache-2.0Yes, Docker Compose (recommended path)Free software. Minimum server: 4 GB RAM, 2 CPU cores, 40 GB SSDYour choice of server, so any region you rent
HostimDB only (plus your own backend)Postgres, MySQL, RedisHosted service, not open sourceNoPostgres from €0 for 256 MB. €10 for 10 GBYes. Germany (Falkenstein)

1. Firebase: Google’s backend with Firestore, the NoSQL database​

BaaS • Proprietary (Google service) • Database: Firestore (NoSQL documents)

Firebase is Google’s hosted backend: a NoSQL database (Firestore), auth, file storage and hosting. It fits mobile and web apps that want a managed backend and already use Google Cloud. Supabase is the usual pick against it, because Supabase uses Postgres and SQL.

Pick it when:

  • Your app is mobile-first and uses the Firebase SDKs.
  • Your data fits document collections, not SQL tables.
  • You want Google’s push, analytics and crash tools in the same project.

Trade-off: Firestore is not SQL. Joins and complex reporting are harder, and the bill can grow with every read and write. The database location is fixed when you create it. Pick a European location on day one if you need EU data residency.

Source: firebase.google.com/pricing

2. Appwrite: an open-source BaaS you can self-host​

BaaS • BSD-3-Clause • Database: Own database API (not Postgres)

Appwrite is an open-source backend with auth, databases, storage, functions and realtime. You can use its cloud or run it on your own server with Docker. It fits teams that want a Firebase-style API with an open-source licence and a self-hosting option.

Pick it when:

  • You want a BaaS under a permissive licence (BSD-3-Clause).
  • You may move the backend to your own server later.

Trade-off: Its database is its own API, not Postgres. If you want plain SQL and Postgres tools, Supabase fits better. Appwrite Cloud's Free plan caps you at 2 projects and 1 database. Storage and bandwidth limits are not stated. In the EU only Frankfurt is live.

Source: github.com/appwrite/appwrite

3. PocketBase: one Go binary with SQLite, self-host only​

BaaS (single binary) • MIT • Database: SQLite (embedded)

PocketBase is an open-source backend in one file: a Go binary with an embedded SQLite database, realtime subscriptions and an admin UI. It fits small apps and prototypes where you want to copy one file to one server and be done.

Pick it when:

  • You want the whole backend in one binary and one SQLite file.
  • Your app has one server and modest traffic.

Trade-off: It is a single-node tool. You own backups, updates and failover. SQLite is not Postgres, so you lose Postgres extensions and the tooling that comes with them. There is no official managed service.

Source: github.com/pocketbase/pocketbase

4. Nhost: Postgres with an instant GraphQL API​

BaaS • MIT • Database: Postgres, with Hasura GraphQL

Nhost is a Postgres backend with auth, storage and a GraphQL API built on Hasura. It is the closest Supabase model in the list, because both sit on Postgres and both give you an API from your schema. It fits teams that want GraphQL first.

Pick it when:

  • You want GraphQL on Postgres with Hasura.
  • You want auth and storage in one managed service.

Trade-off: Its free tier is small: one project and 1 GB of database. Nhost does not state its hosting regions on the pages we checked, so check EU regions before you choose it for EU data.

Source: nhost.io/pricing

5. Convex: a reactive backend written in TypeScript​

Backend platform (framework) • FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0 (source-available, Apache-2.0 after two years) • Database: Convex’s own database

Convex is a backend where your queries, mutations and scheduled jobs are TypeScript functions, and the client updates live. It fits frontend teams that want realtime data with little backend code.

Pick it when:

  • Your team writes TypeScript on both ends and wants live queries.
  • You are happy to write your backend logic in Convex functions.

Trade-off: The licence is not an open-source licence in the OSI sense: it is FSL, which turns into Apache-2.0 two years after each release. Your logic is tied to Convex functions, so moving away is real work. The pages we checked do not name an EU region.

Source: github.com/get-convex/convex-backend

6. Neon: serverless Postgres only​

DB only • Apache-2.0 • Database: Postgres

Neon is serverless Postgres: the database, with branching and scale-to-zero, and nothing else. It fits teams that want Postgres and bring their own auth, storage and API. It is a database, not a backend.

Pick it when:

  • You want Postgres with branches per Git branch.
  • You build your own auth, storage and API code.

Trade-off: Neon has no auth, storage or realtime. The free plan pauses compute after five minutes idle, and that cannot be turned off. Neon is part of Databricks.

Source: neon.com/pricing

7. Self-hosted Supabase: the same product on your own server​

BaaS (self-hosted) • Apache-2.0 • Database: Postgres

Self-hosted Supabase is the Supabase stack, run with Docker Compose on a server you control. It fits teams that need the Supabase feature set and must keep the data on their own hardware. It is the same product, so you do not switch APIs.

Pick it when:

  • You want Supabase features with your own server and your own data location.
  • You can run Linux, Docker and backups yourself.

Trade-off: You run the ops. The guide says mixing individual image tags is not guaranteed to work, and that analytics are off by default. Production also needs HTTPS, SMTP and secrets handling. Read our Supabase self-hosting guide before you start.

Source: supabase.com/docs/guides/self-hosting/docker

Supabase vs Firebase

Postgres and SQL vs Google’s NoSQL documents.

SupabaseFirebase
DatabasePostgres (SQL)Firestore (NoSQL documents)
Self-hostingYes, Docker ComposeNo production self-hosting (emulator is dev only)
Free tier$0: 500 MB database per project, 2 active projects, 1 GB file storage, 50K MAU; paused after 1 week idle1 GiB stored, 50K reads and 20K writes per day
EU locationYes. Ireland, Paris, Frankfurt, Stockholm (Cloud)Yes, eur3 or europe-west3 (Frankfurt), fixed at creation

Pick Supabase if you want SQL, joins and an open-source stack. Pick Firebase if your app is mobile-first and already uses the Firebase SDKs.

Appwrite vs Supabase

Both are open-source backends with auth, storage and functions, and both can be self-hosted with Docker. The difference is the database. Supabase is Postgres. Appwrite has its own database API. Pick Supabase for SQL and Postgres tools. Pick Appwrite if you want a permissive BSD-3-Clause licence and a Firebase-style API.

PocketBase vs Supabase

PocketBase is one MIT-licensed Go binary with an embedded SQLite database. Supabase is a full Postgres stack in many containers. PocketBase is smaller and simpler to run. Supabase scales further, has Postgres, and has a managed option. If you run one server with a small app, PocketBase is enough. If you need Postgres or more load, use Supabase.

Neon vs Supabase

A serverless Postgres database vs a full backend.

NeonSupabase
What it isServerless Postgres onlyPostgres plus auth, storage, realtime and auto API
Free plan$0, 1 GB per project, 100 CU-hours, scales to zero after 5 minutes$0, 500 MB database per project, 2 active projects, 1 GB file storage; paused after 1 week idle
Paid pricingPay as you go: $0.106 per CU-hour, $0.35 per GB-month, no monthly minimum (Launch)See supabase.com/pricing
EU regionFrankfurt and London (AWS; London is outside the EU)Ireland, Paris, Frankfurt, Stockholm (London and Zurich are outside the EU)

Pick Neon when you only need a Postgres database, you write your own auth and API, and you want branches for each Git branch. Pick Supabase when you want the database and the backend services in one product. Supabase saves work when you need auth and storage.

8. Hostim: the database next to your own backend​

This is us. Read it with that in mind.

Hostim is not a BaaS. It has no auth, storage, realtime or auto-generated API. Hostim gives you managed Postgres with a hot standby and failover on every plan, daily backups kept 7 days, and your own app containers in one project. Everything runs in Germany.

Pick it when:

  • You have a backend, or you want to write one, and need Postgres in the EU.
  • You outgrew the BaaS model and want the database next to your own API.
  • You want a flat price: €0 for 256 MB, €10 for 10 GB, see the pricing page.

Trade-off: If you need auth, storage or an API generated from your schema, Hostim does not provide them. Use Supabase, Appwrite or Firebase for that.

Which Supabase alternative should you pick?

Open-source BaaS, permissive licence

Appwrite (BSD-3-Clause).

One small binary

PocketBase (MIT, SQLite, self-host only).

GraphQL on Postgres

Nhost.

Realtime TypeScript backend

Convex (FSL, source-available).

Postgres only, bring your own backend

Neon.

Same product, your own server

Self-hosted Supabase.

Mobile apps on Google

Firebase.

Your backend, managed Postgres in Germany

Hostim.

Moving a Supabase database to Postgres elsewhere? See our Neon alternative page, and free Postgres hosting in Europe.

Not stated on the vendor pages we checked: Appwrite Cloud free storage and bandwidth limits, Nhost EU regions, Convex EU regions. Checked October 2026.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best open-source Supabase alternative?

Appwrite if you want a BaaS with auth, storage and functions under BSD-3-Clause. PocketBase if you want one small binary with SQLite. Self-hosted Supabase if you want the same product on your own server. Nhost is MIT-licensed and can be self-hosted with Docker Compose.

Supabase vs Firebase: which is better?

Firebase if your app is mobile-first, uses the Firebase SDKs and fits document data. Supabase if you want Postgres, SQL joins and an open-source stack. Firestore charges per read and write, so check your usage before you pick it. Firestore EU locations are fixed when the database is created.

Neon vs Supabase: which one?

Neon if you only need serverless Postgres and will write your own auth, storage and API. Supabase if you want the database plus auth, storage, realtime and an auto API. Neon’s free plan pauses compute after five minutes and it has Frankfurt and London regions. The Supabase free plan pauses a project after one week of inactivity, and Supabase Cloud has four EU regions. Supabase is the bigger product.

Can I self-host Supabase?

Yes. The self-hosting guide uses Docker Compose and requires at least 4 GB RAM, 2 CPU cores and 40 GB SSD. You run the upgrades, backups and security yourself. Read our self-hosting guide before you start.

What is the cheapest Supabase alternative?

Self-hosted PocketBase or Supabase cost only the server you rent. Among managed services, Neon’s free plan gives 1 GB per project with compute that pauses when idle. The Supabase free plan gives 500 MB per project and 2 active projects. Hostim gives Postgres from €0 for 256 MB, and €10 for 10 GB, with replicated failover on every plan. Check each price page, because free limits change.

Is there an EU-hosted Supabase alternative?

Yes, if you want a managed EU region. Supabase Cloud has Ireland, Paris, Frankfurt and Stockholm. Neon has Frankfurt (London is outside the EU). Appwrite Cloud has Frankfurt. Firebase has European Firestore locations. Hostim runs in Germany, but it is a database and container host, not a BaaS. Self-hosted Supabase or PocketBase on a European server also keeps data in the EU.

Start now

Put something live today.

Open the dashboard and deploy a Docker image, a Git repo or a template. The 5-day trial project needs no card.